Anandi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48353 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -210 Year- 2016 Thana -HISUA District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Anandi Yadav, Son of Jageshwar Yadav, Resident of Village- Kahariya Beldari, Police Station- Hisua in the district of Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Hisua P.S. Case No. 210 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-307, 379 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that there is land dispute between the informant and the petitioner.

There is allegation that this petitioner assaulted Devgan Nepali with iron rod on his head.

The case diary has been received wherein injury report is available in para-24. The doctor has found only one lacerated wound on the person of the injured. On X-ray, the doctor has found no bony injury. The injury found on the person of injured was simple in nature. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48353 of 2017 (3) dt.28-11-2017 his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 210 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T