Suraj Nut v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46779 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-421 Year-2024 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Suraj Nut Son of Dew Nut Resident of Village- Bangta, P.S.- Dautpur, District- Saran (Chhapra) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sushil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para 3a of the bail petition.
3. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 421 of 2024 dated 24.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 310(2) of the BNSS.
4. As per the prosecution case, six unknown miscreants ridden on three motorcycles are alleged to have stopped the informant and looted his bag containing several electronic gadgets, clothes and other important documents on the point of Katta.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46779 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up on mere suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has 16 criminal antecedents and he is on bail in all the cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 27.03.2025.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gopalganj in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 421 of 2024, with the condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T