Suman Shrivastava @ Sudhanshu Suman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57594 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2015 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== SUMAN SHRIVASTAVA @ SUDHANSHU SUMAN Son of Vijay Krishna Sinha Resident of Mohalla - Jhitkahiya, P.S.- Brahampura, District - Muzaffarpur - 842003 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Atul Chandra,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2021 The present petition, at the behest of the petitioner, is by way of third attempt for grant of regular bail in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 85 of 2015 (S. Tr. No. 108/2018) inasmuch as this Court has dismissed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail vide order dated 04.07.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 24530 of 2018 and by an order dated 31.07.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 46452 of 2019.

The allegation against the accused persons is conspiring together and lobbing bomb on the informant and others resulting in death of an Advocate and a small child. It is alleged that the said Advocate was responsible for undertaking case against the veteran criminals and was doing pairvi on behalf of the informant of this case.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57594 of 2021(2) dt.03-11-2021 2/2 that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.11.2017 and there is no progress at all in the on going trial, hence the petitioner be directed to be released on bail. Per contra, the learned A.P.P. for the State Shri Atul Chandra has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned A.P.P. for the State, I find that there is no change in circumstance from the time this Court had rejected the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail, till today and moreover, the petitioner has not only been alleged to have engaged in commission of a heinous crime but has also got a bad criminal antecedent and is a veteran criminal. In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any reason to reconsider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of regular bail, hence the present petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U T