← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40301/2017bail granted

Satish Kumar @ Satish Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-08-25Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40301 of 2017 (2) dt.25-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40301 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -486 Year- 2016 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Satish Kumar @ Satish Singh aged about 25 years, Son of Sri Raj Kumar, R/o Mohalla- Macharhatta, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- Varanasi, U.P. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .

2. Smt. Aarti Kumari W/o Satish Kumar, D/o Jitulal Chaudhary, R/o Mohalla- Kath ka Pul, P.O.- Patna City, P.S.- Menhdiganj, District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40301 of 2017 (2) dt.25-08-2017 petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Patna City in connection with Complaint case No.486(C) of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T