Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47026/2025bail rejected

Bablu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-16Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47026 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-576 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Bablu Kumar S/o- Arjun Mahto @ Bheda Mahto @ Arjun Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Rajauli Near Purani Bus Stand, P.S. Rajuli, DistrictNawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Premchandra Yadav, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 576 of 2024, S.T. No. 221/2025 dated 14.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. Later on 103 of the B.N.S. was added.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 12.12.2024, the petitioner and 15 unknown persons in a pre-planned manner were waiting at Pranchak Mor, Rajauli and when the informant's grandson namely, Monu Kumar reached Pranchak More then the petitioner assaulted him with lathi on his head and other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47026 of 2025(3) dt.16-09-2025 2/3 accused persons also assaulted him with danda, iron-rod and took out five thousand rupees from his pocket and a gold pendent from his neck. Thereafter, the injured was taken to the hospital for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is a delay of two days in lodging the F.I.R. without any explanation. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. Learned counsel has further submitted that trial has commenced and on 30.04.2025 itself charges have already been framed against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 17.12.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the specific allegation is against the petitioner who assaulted the informant's grand-son on his head with lathi due to which he succumbed to his injury and the said allegation is also supported by the postmortem report where the death has been caused due to intracranial brain injury and haemorrhagic shock due to HBS. The informant in his re-statement in para 3, and the witnesses in para

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47026 of 2025(3) dt.16-09-2025 3/3 nos. 4, 5, 70, 71 and 73 of the case diary have also supported the prosecution case.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner abovenamed on bail.

7. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

8. The application stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T