Umesh Kumar Mahto @ Parma Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1998 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2020 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== UMESH KUMAR MAHTO @ PARMA MAHTO, aged about 38 years, Gender-Male, Son of Late Ramchandra Mahto, Resident of VillageMologanj, P.S.- Laheriasarai, Distt- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 434 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal code and under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1998 of 2021(3) dt.08-12-2021 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U