Md. Taukir Ahmad Asharfi @ Md. Taukeer Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48438 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2020 Thana- MUNGER COMPLAINT CASE District- Munger ====================================================== MD. TAUKIR AHMAD ASHARFI @ MD. TAUKEER AHMAD Son of Late Md. Shamshad Ali Resident of Amir Hussain Lane (Jabbar Chak), P.S. - Tatarpur, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Tabassum Begum Wife of Md. Taukir Ahmad Asharfi @ Taukir Ahmad Daughter of Md Akhtar Ali, A/p resident of Walipur, P.S.- Jamalpur, District - Munger.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. A vakalatnama filed on behalf of Opposite party no.2 is on record but in spite of repeated calls none appeared on her behalf.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498 A, 354 A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Petitioner, who is husband of informant/complainant, is said to have ousted her from the matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48438 of 2022(3) dt.09-01-2023 2/3 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. The entire prosecution story is false, fabricated and concocted. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182.
In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 107C/2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C., Petitioner is ready to pay Rs.3,000.00 (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to the informant/complainant in the second week of every month. If the petitioner fails to pay the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48438 of 2022(3) dt.09-01-2023 3/3 aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, informant/complainant shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.
It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceedings.
Learned Court below is directed to issue notice to informant/complainant for furnishing her bank account details. If she fails to furnish the same, the aforesaid amount will be deposited in the learned Court below which will be released in favour of the informant/complainant after she furnishes her bank account details.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application stands disposed of.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T