Sunil Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1109 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2016 Thana -HARIJAN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ===========================================================

1. Sunil Sah, Son of Late Shri Bhagwan Sah, resident of village - Tenduya, P.O. Babhani, P.S. Kargahar, District - Rohtas .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Sections 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, against refusal of the prayer for anticipatory bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with SC/ST Dehri P.S.Case No. 39 of 2016 registered under Sections 147,148,149,324,379,323,504,506 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 Arms Act as well as under Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act. According to FIR, allegation is against the appellant of commission of abuse by taking caste name. Further allegation is that he assaulted to Manu Ram with Tangi, causing injury at the head of Manu Ram.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1109 of 2016 dt.11-05-2018 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though Manu Ram has supported the aforesaid allegation before the police but there is no injury report to substantiate the allegation.

Considering the nature of allegation against the appellant, the appellant does not deserve anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date15.05.2018 Transmission Date 15.05.2018