Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45930/2025bail rejected

Ravi Sahani @ Ravi Kumar Sahni @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-14Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45930 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2018 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Sahani @ Ravi Kumar Sahni @ Ravi Kumar S/o Bilat Sahni @ Bilat Sahani R/o Village- Gazipur, Police Station- Desri, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 425 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, lodged on 05.12.2024 by the informant, Rajendra Singh.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while he along with his brother were returning from the shop on their respective motorcycles, the accused persons intercepted and opened fire which hit the informant and on alarm of the informant, the locals approached the accused who tried to escape but fell down. However, they managed to escape by foot, they were taken for treatment which followed the F.I.R.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45930 of 2025(4) dt.14-11-2025 2/2

4. In this case, the Trial Court Report was called for according to which, the trial is on and is running for prosecution evidences.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has remained in custody since 24.04.2024.

6. On the other hand, Mr. Bharat Lal representing the State opposes the prayer for bail submitting that not only he has 18 criminal antecedents under his belt, the matter is of the year 2018 and he came into judicial custody only in the year 2024 and if given a chance, he will again abscond.

7. Considering the conduct of the petitioner and the criminal antecedent that he has, no second thought is required.

8. The bail application stands rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T