← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9749/2020disposed

Radha Kant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-06-29Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9749 of 2020 ====================================================== Radha Kant Singh Son of Ambika Singh, Resident of Village - Ramduall, P.S. Bidupur, District - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 3.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 4.

The Additional Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur. 5.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali. 6.

The District Supply Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 7.

The Block Supply Officer, Bidupur, Vaishali at Hajipur. 8.

The Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 9.

The District Grievances Redressal Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 10.

Sri Jitendra Singh, Son of Nawal Kishore Singh, Resident of Village - Ramdauli, P.S.- Bidupur, District - Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2021 The present application has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondents to take appropriate action against respondent no.10.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that various irregularities have been committed in the distribution of goods.

Considering the nature of relief, prayed for in the present writ application, the writ petition is disposed of with a

Patna High Court CWJC No.9749 of 2020(3) dt.29-06-2021 2/2 direction to the District Magistrate, Vaishali to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law after providing opportunity of hearing to the persons likely to be adversely affected including respondent no.10.

Necessary order in accordance with law may be passed by the respondent District Magistrate within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

While passing the District Magistrate shall also look into the order passed by the Commissioner in this regard. With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U