Renu Devi @ Reena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46041 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2024 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Renu Devi @ Reena Devi W/O Santosh Yadav R/O Village- Kashibigha, P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, District- Gaya.

2.

Amit Kumar S/O Dhirendra Yadav R/O Village- Kashibigha, P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, District- Gaya.

3.

Suman Kumari D/O Dhirendra Yadav R/O Village- Kashibigha, P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Md. Aslam Ansari, learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 176 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115, 110, 125(a), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the the petitioners along with others assaulted the informant and his family members with lathi, danda and iron rod.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46041 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/3 that there is a counter version of this case which was filed earlier and it has also been submitted that in this case, police has submitted final form despite that learned CJM took cognizance. From perusal of the FIR itself it is clear that nature of allegation is general and omnibus and from perusal of the order of the trial court it transpires that the supplementary injury report of injured Sailendra Kumar shows a hair line fracture seen in right 2nd proximal phalange, though this injury is grievous but still it comes under the ambit of bailable offences.

5. Learned APP for the State has conceded to the argument of learned counsel for the petitioners that after final form cognizance has been taken against the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 176 of 2024, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each of them with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46041 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T