Deovrat Kushwaha @ Siddharth Kumar @ Deovrat Kushwala v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46908 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Deovrat Kushwaha @ Siddharth Kumar @ Deovrat Kushwala, Son of Rishikesh Kumar Resident of Village - Gondapur, P.S.- Nawada (Town), District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2019 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S. Case No. 269 of 2019, registered under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada. The accusation is that on 05.03.2019, the petitioner accompanied the grand daughter of the informant Vijay Prasad on the pretext to provide coaching of computer, but grand daughter of the informant did not return, then informant went at the house of petitioner then his parents assured to the informant that they will return very soon. Later on, informant come to know that his grand daughter is in Sadar Hospital. When informant reached at Sadar Hospital then found

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46908 of 2019(2) dt.30-07-2019 2/2 his grand daughter in injured condition.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, in fact, petitioner along with grand daughter of the informant and one Rituraj Singh moved for visiting Rajgir boarding on a motorcycle, but in the way, the vehicle of the petitioner was dashed by a tractor in which grand daughter of the informant sustained injury and she was brought to the Hospital for treatment and information was also given to the informant.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T