Pramod Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73815 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2018 Thana- NTPC District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Pramod Yadav 2.
Sharekh yadav 3.
Lalo Yadav @ Lal Bahadur Yadav 4.
Gunjan Yadav @ Anuj Yadav All sons of Rawan Yadav @ Ram Nandan Yadav R/o Village -Mangarchak, P.S. NTPC, Barh, District -Patna ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Chandra Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Jainendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 07-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with NTPC P.S. Case No. 57 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute between the parties. The injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Learned APP assisted by learned counsel appearing for the informant opposes the anticipatory bail petition, submitting that there is accusation of assault with Kudal (spade) by petitioner no. 2 on the head of the informant.
5. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73815 of 2018(3) dt.07-03-2019 2/2 communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with NTPC P.S. Case No. 57 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and with further conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives.
(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T