Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46280/2025bail granted

Md. Parvez @ Pinku @ Pravez Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-19Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46280 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2025 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Parvez @ Pinku @ Pravez Alam S/O Late Kurvan Hazi R/O VillageShahpur, Prithavipatti, ward no 7, PS- Bhaptiyahi, district- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Abdul Jalil S/O Md. Sadrul Haque R/O Village- Shahpur, Prithavipatti, ward no 7, PS- Bhaptiyahi, district- Supaul ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025, GR Case No. 302 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 96, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3 Accusation against the petitioner is of luring away the informant's daughter with the intent of marriage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that victim in her Statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46280 of 2025(5) dt.19-11-2025 2/3 specifically stated that she left her house on her own sweet will and this petitioner never gave any compulsion or threat to her. He further submitted that nothing has been whispered against the petitioner in Section 183 BNSS statement of the victim. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 21.05.2025 and has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no material against the petitioner in Section 183 BNSS statement of the victim as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 29 of 2025, GR Case No. 302 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46280 of 2025(5) dt.19-11-2025 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T