Jairam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56679 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2021 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== SUNIL KUMAR S/o Siyaram Yadav Resident of Village - Acchua, P.S. - Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 57755 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2021 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
JAIRAM YADAV Son of Dhaneshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Acchua, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna.
2.
Uday Yadav @ Uday Kumar @ Guddu Kumar S/o Siyaram Yadav Resident of Village- Acchua, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna. 3.
Mandal Yadav S/o Jairam Yadav Resident of Village- Acchua, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56679 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Singh (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 57755 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-04-2022 Re. Cr. Misc. No. 56679 of 2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56679 of 2021(2) dt.28-04-2022 2/3 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 129/2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
There is specific allegation of assault against the petitioner causing injury on the neck.
In view of the above, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Re. Cr. Misc. No. 57755 of 2021 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 129/2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
The specific allegation of assault is against Sunil Kumar.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56679 of 2021(2) dt.28-04-2022 3/3 the present anticipatory bail application is allowed. Accordingly, let the petitioners above named be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 129 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T