Subodh Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51930 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2023 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Subodh Manjhi Son of Late Munshi Manjhi R/o Village - Dariyapur, P.S.- Tekari Panchananpur, District - Gaya 2.
Amit Manjhi @ Japani Manjhi Son of Late Munshi Manjhi R/o Village - Dariyapur, P.S.- Tekari Panchananpur, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant's side brutally with deadly weapons.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51930 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/3 offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is previous enmity between the parties. The present case is counterblast of Tekari P.S. Case No. 168 of 2023. The injuries sustained by the injured were found simple in nature. Similarly situated co-accused, namely, Ramesh Kumar has been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 18.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4863 of 2024. Petitioner no.1 has one criminal antecedent, whereas petitioner no.2 has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51930 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 3/3 satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Tekari (Panchananpur) P.S. Case No. 184 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T