Pradeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45525 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2023 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Pradeep Kumar son of Laddu Lal Sahani Village- Manjhaul Bichkhana Ward no. 14, Ps- Cheriabariyapur, Dist- Begusarai 2.

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Sahni son of Laddu Lal Sahni Village- Manjhaul Bichkhana Ward no. 14, Ps- Cheriabariyapur, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Randhir Kumar No 1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seeks bail in connection with Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No. 325 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 457, 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that some unknown thieves committed theft of gold and silver ornaments and cash amounting to Rs. 4,000/- in the house of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. The names of the petitioners transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Vikash Kumar. No incriminating article

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45525 of 2025(2) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioners have got no concern with the theft articles. Learned counsel further submitted that cognizance has been taken against the petitioner and charge has also been framed. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 18.10.2023 and have eighteen criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, since charge has already framed as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No. 325 of 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T