Shiv Shankar Dhobi @ Shiv Shankar Rajak @ Teyagi Jee @ Shiv Jee @ Chandeshwar Rajak v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 44666 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2014 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Shiv Shankar Dhobi @ Shiv Shankar Rajak @ Teyagi Jee @ Shiv Jee @ Chandeshwar Rajak, aged about 65 Years (Male), S/o Karmu Rajak @ Kalut Dhobi , R/o village- Pachariya, P.S.- Rafiganj, Distt.- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Md. Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amas PS Case No. 26 of 2014 (GR No. 229 of 2014) dated 23.02.2014 instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 353, 435, 335, 395, 120B, 121A, 124A of the Indian Penal Code; Section 27 of the Arms Act; Section 17 of the CLA Act and Sections 10/13 of the UAP Act.
3. The petitioner along with 21 others and 200-275 unknown is accused of attacking a police station for looting of arms and ammunition resulting in death of a civilian who was passing through the area.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44666 of 2019 dt.04-12-2019 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though he is accused in 23 other cases but he is on bail in many cases.
5. Learned APP submitted that the petitioner besides being named, is accused in 23 similar cases lodged under various police stations right from the year 1998. It was submitted that the name of the petitioner transpired from what was heard by the policeman during the incident when the accused were calling each other. He submitted that in the firing made by the accused, one person driving an Indica car also sustained gunshot injury resulting in his death.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T