Md. Shahid Hussain v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10631 of 2023 ====================================================== Md. Shahid Hussain Son of Abdul Rauf Ansari, Resident of Makhdum Chak Janpur, P.S- Sigori, District- Patna, Pin Code- 801110. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna. 2.
The Regional Passport Officer, 2nd and 3rd Floor, D-Block, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna-800001.
3.
The Superintendent, Passport office, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Parashuram Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Tuhin Shankar, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-01-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The present application has been filed for quashing the letter no. SCN/316363592/20 dated 12.08.2020, letter no. IMP/316577646/20 dated 18.09.2020 and letter no. REM/318475526/21 dated 30.09.2021 by which the grievance of the petitioner for re-issuance of passport was not considered.
3. The petitioner had applied for renewal of passport by suppressing the criminal case. Now the petitioner submits that in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dhiren Baxi vs. Regional Passport Officer reported as AIR 2003 Gujarat 108. Learned counsel further submits that he may be allowed to reapply in accordance with
Patna High Court CWJC No.10631 of 2023(4) dt.09-01-2024 2/2 the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the different High Courts.
4. This application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to reapply in accordance with law after seeking permission from the criminal Court.
5. If such an application is filed, the Regional Passport Officer or his/her subordinate may take a decision in accordance with law whether to renew the passport of the petitioner or not.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this application is disposed of.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U