Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6101/2015bail granted

Shyam Nandan Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-13Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6101 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2013 Thana -RAJEPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Shyam Nandan Kushwaha @ Shyam Nandan Kuswaha son of Rajendra Prasad, Resident of village- Tajpur Saraiya, P.S.- Rajepur, District- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar No.Iii, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suman Kri Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 13-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 387 of IPC. Allegation is that Rs.5,00,000/- was demanded as rangdari from the informant through mobile.

It is submitted that during investigation the name of the petitioner has appeared in the confessional statement of Lallan Prasad Kushwaha who has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 15282 of 2014 and the petitioner has been in custody since 9.9.2014.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6101 of 2015 (2) dt.13-02-2015 2/2 petitioner has several criminal antecedents.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate at Motihari, East Champaran/court concerned in Rajepur P. S. Case No. 48 of 2013 after framing of charge with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T