Pramod Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48726 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2023 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Pramod Pandey Son Of Late Ramashrya Pandey Resident Of VillageSikandarpur, Ps- Sangrampur, Dist- East Champaran 2.

Chhoti Kumari Daughter Of Pramod Pandey Resident Of VillageSikandarpur, Ps- Sangrampur, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Samir Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 308, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, when informant was returning to his house, petitioner no.1 Pramod Pandey stopped him at his door and abused him. On oppose, petitioner no.1 along with other co-accused persons assaulted him. After two days, petitioners along with five unknown persons again assaulted the informant and took out his gold chain worth Rs.4 Lacs.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48726 of 2023(2) dt.25-08-2023 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners are not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties and both sides had sustained injuries. Injury was found to be simple in nature which is clear from the impugned order. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that injury was found simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 60 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) saurabhkrsinha/- U