Kailash Yadav And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8993 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2014 Thana -HARPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Kailash Yadav son of Sita Ram Yadav
2. Rahul Yadav son of Chhabilal Yadav, both are resident of village Batsar, P.S. Harpur, District Munger .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Nath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that there is only a general allegation against the Petitioners, who have fair antecedents, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd, Munger in connection with Sessions Trial No.877 of 2014 arising out of Harpur P.S. Case No.05 of 2014, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8993 of 2015 (2) dt.03-03-2015 2/2 with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T