Company Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51104 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2023 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Company Ram Son of Late Kailu Ram, R/o Vill.- Kiranpur, P.s.- Medni Chowki, Dist.- Lakhisarai 2.

Usha Devi Wife of Company Ram, R/o Vill.- Kiranpur, P.s.- Medni Chowki, Dist.- Lakhisarai 3.

Baban Kumar Son of Company Ram, R/o Vill.- Kiranpur, P.s.- Medni Chowki, Dist.- Lakhisarai 4.

Pawan Kumar Son of Company Ram, R/o Vill.- Kiranpur, P.s.- Medni Chowki, Dist.- Lakhisarai 5.

Daulati Devi Wife of Nawal Ram, R/o Vill.- Kiranpur, P.s.- Medni Chowki, Dist.- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Medni Chowki P.S. Case No. 185 of 2023 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 354, 308, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 26.10.2023 all the accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant, her husband and children and when the incident was informed to the Police, they again assaulted the informant, her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51104 of 2024(2) dt.31-08-2024 2/3 husband and children on 30.10.2023 causing injury on their head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to family dispute. He further submits that both the parties are member of the same family. The injuries on the injured are not grievous in nature. The allegations against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. He also submits that petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 3 have one criminal antecedent in which they are on bail whereas the petitioner nos. 4 & 5 have no criminal antecedent and they undertake to co-operate in the investigation and the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai / Concerned Trial Court in connection with Medni Chowki P.S. Case No. 185 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51104 of 2024(2) dt.31-08-2024 3/3 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) ashishkr/- U T