Vikram Kumar @ Vikki v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48211 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-527 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== VIKRAM KUMAR @ VIKKI Son Of Upendra Prasad Singh, Resident Of Village - Bisaria, P.S. - Korha, District - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sah, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-08-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 527 of 2023, dated 27.04.2023 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 401, 413, 414 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel are that the instant matter relates to the recovery of a motorcycle from the joint possession of this petitioner and coaccused Nirmal Kumar @ Nirmal Sharma and the said motorcycle was suspected to be stolen on account of nonproduction of relevant vehicular papers by the accused persons and petitioner's mobile phone was also seized by the police. Further submissions are that prior to institution of the FIR there
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48211 of 2023(2) dt.03-08-2023 2/2 was one criminal case against this petitioner but after the institution of the present FIR he was dragged into two other criminal cases and in the present matter, he has been languishing in jail since 27.04.2023 and against him, the investigation has been completed. Further submissions are that the petitioner is a very young person and the alleged motorcycle which was suspected to be stolen was not recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner.
4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. Considering the above-submissions, mainly the petitioner's young age and the completion of investigation against him, this Court is inclined to accept the petitioner's prayer for bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 527 of 2023.
(Shailendra Singh, J.) Maynaz/- U T