Jai Prakash Yadav @ Jay Prakash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45797 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2025 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Jai Prakash Yadav @ Jay Prakash Yadav S/O Ramashish Yadav R/O VillageAithi, P.S- Vijaipur, Dist.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Brahmaputra Singh Ishu, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP For the informant :
Mr. Dharamveer, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard Mr. Brahmaputra Singh Ishu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, learned APP for the State beside Mr. Dharamveer, learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 148 of 2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 lodged on 20.05.2025 by the informant, Rajendra Yadav.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while sitting at the door, his agnates, accused persons armed variously came and started abusing the informant. Upon objection, allegation is that Manish Yadav used iron rod and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45797 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 when the grand-daughter Chhoti Kumari came to his rescue, allegation against this petitioner is of hitting on her head causing injury. Thereafter, Kanhaiya Yadav outraged her modesty while Tapan Yadav assaulted his son. As the villagers assembled, they left the place. This led to the FIR.
4. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court about the innocence of the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant took this Court to the learned Sessions Judge order to show that the injury report of Chhoti Kumari shows the same to be grievous in nature as recorded in the CT brain report.
5. In that background, for the present, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of bail which is accordingly rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T