Dr. Rashmi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57468 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2021 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna ====================================================== DR. RASHMI D/o Mr. Bhunandan Baraik R/O Flat No. -101, Defence Colony, P.S. - Kankarbagh, District - Patna -800020. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nilanjan Chatterjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 171 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that she along with other co-accused person is operating the shops of the husband of the complainant fraudulently by creating forged documents and earning huge amount from the assets of the husband of the complainant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57468 of 2021(4) dt.17-10-2022 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that complainant became mentally depressed on sudden demise of her husband and therefore she could not take care of the assets, property and business of her late husband. He submits that accusation is based on the business transaction between the parties. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sri Krishnapuri P.S. Case No. 76 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.