Satyendra Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3068 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Satyendra Kumar, Son of Late Ram Lagan Singh, Resident of MohallaBaldeo Bhawan Road, Puanichak, P.O. + P.S.- Shastrinagar, District- Patna.

2. Kalyani, S/o Sri Rajeev Ranjan, resident of Village- Sherpur, P.O. Sherpur, P.S. Maner, District- Patna.

3. Mukesh Kumar, Son of Prithvi Kumar Sinha, resident of Mohalla- Sinha Homeo Hall, Post Office Road, Punaichak, P.O. & P.S.- Shastrinagar, District- Patna- 23.

4. Rina Kumari, Wife of Dr. Rajeev Kumar, Resident of VillageNavanagar Nizamat, Brajnandan Chowk, P.O. Kurnowl, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

5. Priyanka Kumari, Wife of Upendra Kumar Chaubey, resident of Village- Navanagar Nizamat (Mokritola) P.O. Kurnowl, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

6. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Son of Sri Shankar Pandey, Resident of Village- Bakhra, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.

7. Akhilesh Kumar, Son of Late Badri Narain Sah. Resident of VillageBrahmpura, P.O. Bakhra, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Director, Mass Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6. The District Mass Education Officer, Patna.

7. The District Education Officer, Patna.

8. The District Mass Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

9. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Kumar-Gp17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2018 The parties are in agreement that the present writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the order dated 03.03.2017 passed in CWJC No. 384 of 2017 and analogous cases and the judgment of the learned Division Bench dated 23.01.2018 passed

Patna High Court CWJC No.3068 of 2018 (2) dt.26-02-2018 2/2 in LPA No. 1047 of 2017.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid two orders passed in the writ petition and the LPA.

The State Government should take steps in the light of the aforesaid two judgments and redress the grievances of the petitioner herein.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U