Lankeshwar Das v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24893 of 2016 (4) dt.25-07-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24893 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2016 Thana -PATNA GRP CASE District- PATNA ====================================================== Lankeshwar Das son of late Mohan Das, resident of Village Shivachak, P.S. Phulwarisharif, District Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2016 in connection with Patna Rail P.S. Case No. 36 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 419. 420, 379 and 401 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is delay in instituting the F.I.R. on 19.02.2016 for the alleged occurrence of 17.02.2016. No recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Statement is made at the bar that similarly situated co-accused Bhola Paswan has been granted bail by this Court.
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24893 of 2016 (4) dt.25-07-2016 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Patna Rail P.S. Case No. 36 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner; and the petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on three consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T