Startek Logistics Private Limited v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2780 of 2018 ====================================================== Startek Logistics Private Limited (Now Known as Spoton Logistics Private Limited), a Company incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 having its Office at B 52-54, Paragon Godown, Transport Nagar, Patna 800007, Bihar, through its Asst. Manager Administration, Subhendu Kar, Son of Shri Niren Kar, resident of 32/ E Halderpara Lane, P.O. Khurut + P.S. Sibhpur Howrah.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna having its Office at Vikas Bhawan Patna.

2. Asst. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. Investigation Bureau, Patna East & West Division, Patna.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy and Mr. Sadashiv Tiwari, Advocates.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC 11. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 15-02-2018 Seeking a limited indulgence by this Court with regard to coercive action initiated by the respondent revenue in the matter of recovery of penalty by attaching the Bank A/c of the petitioner in respect of the fact that an appeal filed by the petitioner is pending before the competent Appellate Tribunal but hearing of the appeal and the stay application is not possible on account of non-availability of the Chairman and functioning of the tribunal properly, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking indulgence exercised in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution limited to the purpose to restrain the respondents

Patna High Court CWJC No.2780 of 2018 (3) dt.15-02-2018 2/3 from taking coercive action till hearing, at least, on the stay application of the petitioner is granted by the Appellate Tribunal. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find that after the impugned order was passed on 13.12.2017 the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commercial Taxs Tribunal, Bihar, Patna on 29.12.2017 along with an application for stay and the application for stay in the appeal is yet to be taken for hearing by the Tribunal. Hearing before the Tribunal is not possible because no Chairman has been appointed by the Government and the Tribunal, as on date, is not functional. In the meanwhile by the impugned notice (Annexure3) dated 04.01.2018 the petitioner was directed to deposit the entire amount of penalty, i.e., Rs. 53,36,670.

00 on or before 23.01.2018, failing which it was said that coercive action shall be taken and consequently it is informed that after filing of this petition the entire Bank A/c of the petitioner bearing Current A/c No. 00090330005723 with the H.D.F.C. Bank, Bangalore, as detailed in the order dated 13.02.2018, has been seized. Even though Sri Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents, vehemently opposed the prayer made in the Writ Petition and submitted that the petitioner should deposit some amount pending finalization of the appeal.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2780 of 2018 (3) dt.15-02-2018 3/3 We are of the considered view that when there is no statutory provision warranting pre-deposit of any amount as a condition precedent under the statute for filing of an appeal and when the appeal of the petitioner is not being heard on account of non-functioning of the Tribunal, at least, till a hearing is granted to the petitioner by the Tribunal coercive action by the department should be kept in abeyance as the petitioner cannot be made to suffer on account of the lapses on the part of the Government for not making the Tribunal functional keeping.

In view the aforesaid, we direct that till the orders are not passed by the Commercial Taxes Tribunal on the appeal filed by the petitioner or on the application for stay filed by the petitioner, all coercive actions initiated against the petitioner now shall be kept in abeyance and the aforesaid Bank A/c of the petitioner which has been attached shall also be released till the orders are not passed by the Commercial Taxes Tribunal, Bihar, Patna.

With the aforesaid, the matter stands disposed off. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR U