Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51556/2023dismissed

Babloo Lal @ Babloo Kumar @ Amit Lal @ Amit Kumar Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51556 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2022 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Babloo Lal @ Babloo Kumar @ Amit Lal @ Amit Kumar Srivastava S/o Late Birendra Kumar Srivastava @ Birendra Lal Resident of Village-Semariyan, P.S.-Ara Muffasil, District-Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amarendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 258 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the deceased who was a collection Agent of a company while returning after collecting money was killed by unknown criminals.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got one criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 15.08.2022. He further submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case and has no connection with the alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51556 of 2023(3) dt.11-10-2023 2/2 occurrence.

5. During investigation, it has come that the deceased had collected money from the petitioner also and thereafter, the petitioner had informed other criminals and they committed the murder of the deceased when the petitioner was identified by the deceased. The Call Detail Record (CDR) location of the petitioner also supports his participation in the crime.

6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

7. In view of the above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner who is the main prayer in the murder though some other co-accused have been granted bail.

8. This application is dismissed with a direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial at the earliest. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T