← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48007/2022dismissed

Guddu Chauhan @ Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48007 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2022 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== Guddu Chauhan @ Mukesh Kumar Son of Om Prakash @ Om Prakash Chauhan Resident of Village - Kochas, P.S.- Kochas, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Kumar Sunil, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 457, 380, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner in association of other named F.I.R. persons are said to have committed theft in the dwelling house of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48007 of 2022(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that some articles of theft were recovered from the house of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Shahnawaz/- U T