← Library
Patna High CourtC.R./124/2019dismissed

Md. Amanatullah Salfi @ Md. Amanutullah v. Girish Chandra Mandal

2025-09-09Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVISION No.124 of 2019 ====================================================== Md. Amanatullah Salfi @ Md. Amanutullah, aged about 68 years, GenderMale, Son of Late Md. Leyaquat Hussain, Resident of Mohalla- Imam Bari, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga.

Defendant no. 1... ... Petitioner.... Petitioner 1st set

Versus

1.

Girish Chandra Mandal, Son of Mit Lal Mandal, Resident of Mohalla- Imam Bari, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga. .......... Plaintiff.............. Respondent 1st, Set-Opposite party 1st set. 2.

Sanaullah, Son of Md. Amanutullah Salfi @ Md. Amanutullah. Resident of Mohalla- Imam Bari, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga. 3.

Hamidullah, Son of Md. Amanutullah Salfi @ Md. Amanutullah. Resident of Mohalla- Imam Bari, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga. 4.

Samiullah, Son of Md. Amanutullah Salfi @ Md. Amanutullah. Resident of Mohalla- Imam Bari, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga. ........ Defendant no. 2 to 4 .....Respondent 2nd Set-Opposite Parties 2nd set 5.

Amiriti Devi Wife of Late Harekrishna Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Imam Bari, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga. 6.

Smt. Rajo Devi, Daughter of Late Harekrishna Sah, Resident of MohallaImam Bari, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga. 7.

Smt. Raj Rani Devi, Daughter of Late Harekrishna Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Imam Bari, P.S.- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga. Defendant 2nd Party... ... Respondent 3rd Set- Opposite Party 3rd Set ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bishwanath Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Arif Daula Siddiqui, Advocate Mr. Noumaan Ahmad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

Patna High Court C.R. No.124 of 2019(6) dt.09-09-2025 2/2 ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn having become infructuous.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.

U