Manish Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5329 of 2018 ====================================================== Manish Kumar Jha aged about 37 years, son of Sri Surya Kant Jha, resident of C/O Chandrama Singh, Road No. 2 near Health Institute, Beur, Police Station Beur, District Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.
2. The Deputy Development Commissoner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Zila Parishad, Patna.
3. The Patna Municipal Corporation through the Municipal Commissioner, Maurya Lok, Patna.
4. The Bihar School Examination Board through the Secretary, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rupak Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Umesh Narayan Dubey-A.C. to GP-27 For Zila Parishad :
Mr. Nikesh Kumar, Advocate For P.M.C.
:
Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Advocate For B.S.E.B.
:
Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 01-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Considering the prayer made in the writ application, at this stage the Court is not in a position to issue any positive direction. However, the Court hope and trust that when the respondent-authorities have invited application for appointment, they will take the issue of appointment to its logical end as they have not invited application to complete public relation exercise but they are supposed to make appointment.
In the aforesaid circumstance, the writ application is disposed of with observation that the respondent-authorities will
Patna High Court CWJC No.5329 of 2018(2) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 take step to finalize the selection process to fill up the vacancies at the earliest in order to complete the selection process for which they have invited application. While taking decision, they are required to consider that the eligibility acquired pursuant to eligibility test in 2011 is only valid for 7 years and the eligibility will become illusionary if appointment process is not completed by the respondent within a period of 7 years from the date of acquiring eligibility.
With the aforesaid writ application stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sarvesh Kumar Singh/SPandey U