← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4185/2021bail granted

Dinesh Choudhary @ Tiju v. The State Of Bihar

2021-04-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4185 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1609 Year-2018 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== DINESH CHOUDHARY @ TIJU SON OF DUNMUN CHOUDHARY Resident of Village - Teladhi, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rina Devi W/o Dinesh Choudhary @ Tiju, D/o Vishundayal Choudhary Resident of Village - Teladhi, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna. present addressRina Devi C/o Vishundayal Choudhary Village - khajuri, P.S.- Naubatpur, Distt.- Patna. Pin No.-801109 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 379, 498(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and assault upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4185 of 2021(2) dt.07-04-2021 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Danapur, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 1609(C) of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4185 of 2021(2) dt.07-04-2021 3/3 matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T