Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43460/2016bail granted

Rambilash Yadav @ Bhuttu Yadav @ Bhutta Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-18Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43460 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2015 Thana -ARIYARI District- SHEIKHPURA ====================================================== Rambilash Yadav @ Bhuttu Yadav @ Bhutta Yadav Son of Late Janki Yadav Resident of Village- Ranka, P.S.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2016 As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in paragraph 1 of the bail petition incorporating the offences alleged under the Arms Act in course of the day.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

3. The petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2016 in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No. 130 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

4. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated owing to land dispute as evident from the F.I.R. itself. No injury has been caused to anyone in the alleged quarrel by the accused persons including the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura, in connection with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43460 of 2016 (2) dt.18-10-2016 Ariyari P.S. Case No. 130 of 2015, with the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T