← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57761/2021bail granted

Md. Pravez @ Pravez v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-25Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57761 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2020 Thana- ANTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

MD. PRAVEZ @ PRAVEZ Son of Rafiq Mian @ Rafiq Ansari Resident of Village - Achuki, P.S.- Anti, Dist.- Gaya.

2.

Md. Taukir Alam @ Taukir Alam @ Taukir Son of Rafiq Mian @ Rafiq Ansari Resident of Village - Achuki, P.S.- Anti, Dist.- Gaya. 3.

Md. Hasnain @ Hasnain Son of Rafiq Mian @ Rafiq Ansari Resident of Village - Achuki, P.S.- Anti, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Durgesh Nandan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Anti P.S. Case no. 53 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, a scuffle took place at the time of family partition of land and house. Petitioners have assaulted the informant resulting into his head injury. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57761 of 2021(2) dt.25-04-2022 2/2 has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case with a view to pressurize them. No specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioners. Petitioners and informant are full brothers and there was a dispute over a certain plot of land, which was later on resolved and good relations between them has been restored. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Anti P.S. Case no. 53 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U