Sonu Rai @ Sonu Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48163 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2023 Thana- KARAMCHAT District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sonu Rai @ Sonu Singh Yadav Son Of Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Ahir R/O Village Bhitari Bandh, Ps- Karamchat, Distt- Kaimur (BHABUA) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-08-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

3. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Karamchat P.S Case No. 45 of 2023 dated 11.06.2023 registered for the offence punishable u/s 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants boarded in two motor-cycles intercepted the tractor of the informant and snatched the key of the tractor. On being objected, they assaulted the informant and his friends.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48163 of 2023(2) dt.08-08-2023 2/3 Thereafter, they snatched 3 mobile phones and Rs. 3,000/- from the pocket of the informant. On hulla, four miscreants started fleeing away but two miscreants were apprehended who disclosed their names as Arvind Kumar Yadav (the petitioner), Sonu Rai and also disclosed the name of persons who fled away as Ankit Singh and Raghunath Singh.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2023.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Karamchat P.S. Case No. 45 of 2023.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48163 of 2023(2) dt.08-08-2023 3/3

8. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) ravikr/- U T