Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51035/2017bail granted

Chinta Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-18Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51035 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2017 Thana -DIDARGANJ District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Chinta Devi

2. Lolin Rai @ Lolin Raki

3. Mukesh Kumar &

4. Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhiles @ Akles Kumar @ Awadhesh Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Didarganj P.S. Case No. 113 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-379 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

From the written report, it appears that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioners that they took away jewellery and Rs. 26,000/- from the pocket of the informant. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 113 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51035 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 Magistrate, Patna City subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T