Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44630 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2019 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== BITTU KUMAR Son of Bharat Sah Resident of Village-Britti Tola, Police Station-Jagdishpur, District-West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Nautan (Jagdishpur) P. S. Case No. 147 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 399,402 and 414 of the IPC and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged that police got secret information that 78 miscreants were assembled and are planning to commit offence. Police reached at the place of occurrence. It is further alleged that after seeing the police party 4-5 miscreants managed to run away. The petitioner along with Chandan Kumar was apprehended . It is further alleged that one loaded country made pistol, and one live cartridge has been recovered from possession of this petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44630 of 2019(2) dt.23-07-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has been implicated in this case due to village politics. Petitioner is in custody since 12.4.2019.

Keeping in view the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan (Jagdishpur) P. S. Case No. 147 of 2019 subject to the following conditions:- (i) Both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(iii) If petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T