← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17179/2021disposed

Baban Pandit v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary

2025-06-26Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17179 of 2021 ====================================================== Baban Pandit Son of Late Yadu Pandit Resident of Village - Bakarpur, Police - Station - Sonepur, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal - Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Chief Vigilance Officer, Government of Bihar Patna. 4.

The Director, Vigilance, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Inspector General of Vigilance, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

The District Magistrate Saran at Chapra.

7.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra. 8.

The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra. 9.

The District Programs Officer Education Establishment Saran at Chapra. 10.

The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board Patna. 11.

The Secretary, Bihar Intermediate Education Board Patna. 12.

The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board Patna. 13.

The Block Development Officer, Sonepur, District- Saran. 14.

The Block Education Officer, Sonepur, District- Saran. 15.

Hira Lal Prasad @ Hira Lal Bhagat Son of Munshi Prasad Residence of Village - Bakarpur, Post - Office - Govind Chak Police - Station Sonepur, District- Saran at Chapra, Presently Posted as Panchayat / Block Teacher at Utkarmit Middle School Bakarpur, Police - Station - Sonepur, DistrictSaran. 16.

The Headmaster, K.P.S.P. High School Gangajal, Sonepur, District- Saran. 17.

The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dudhaila Panchayat, Police - Station -Sonepur, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shambhu Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Namrata Singh, AC to EX GA -12 For the Respondent nos.10-11 :

Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai, Advocate For the BSEB :

Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, Advocate For the Vigilance :

Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CWJC No.17179 of 2021(3) dt.26-06-2025 2/3 26-06-2025 Heard Mr. Shambhu Prasad Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Ms. Namrata Singh, learned AC to EX GA -12 for the State; Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai, learned counsel appearing of behalf of the respondent nos.10 and 11; Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bihar School Examination Board and Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the vigilance.

2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought inter alia the following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:- "(i) To terminate the respondent no.15, who has got appointment as Panchayat teacher on forged certificates and also in wrong category accordingly recovery of salary must be made after lodging the F.I.R. in the light of judgement of Hon'ble Court passed in CWJC No. 15459/2014 Ranjeet Pandit and another V/s State of Bihar & Ors.

(ii) To direct the respondent to impose heavy cost upon erring authorities who have not taken any step for enquiry of certificate through the Vigilance inspite of representation of petitioner?

(iii) To provide any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled for?"

3. Considering the relief(s) as prayed for in the present writ petition, as well as, the specific statement and information contained in counter affidavit, filed on behalf of the respondent nos.4, 5, 9, 10, 11 and 15, I find that in view of the communication made by the Block Education Officer, Sonepur, Saran vide letter dated 25.10.2018 to the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Saran, the District Programme Officer

Patna High Court CWJC No.17179 of 2021(3) dt.26-06-2025 3/3 may take steps to file an application before the learned Lokayukta for thorough inquiry into the matter and for taking proper action, in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U