Munna Kebat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1118 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2015 Thana -CHEWRA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Munna Kebat, Son of Tota Kebat, Resident of Village - Chewara, Beldariya, P.S. - Chewara, District - Sheikhpura. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 12-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 427, 337, 338, 332, 333, 353, 323, 326, 325, 307 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
It is contended that the petitioner was not an accused in the earlier case which has been mentioned in the F.I.R. being Chewara P.S. Case No.4/2015 and there is no specific allegation of assault against him. It is further contended that two accused persons, namely, Pradeep Saw and Prakash Kewat, who are on identical footing, have already been granted bail vide order dated 14.01.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No.45367/2015. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1118 of 2016 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 case, let the petitioner, namely, Munna Kebat be released on bail in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Chewara P.S. Case No.5/2015, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand Rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a further condition that one of the bailors must be father of the petitioner. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T