Nikki Kumar @ Nikki Kumar Sharma @ Nicki Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.250 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) =========================================================== Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, Resident of village- Repura, P.s. Sitamarhi, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s with =========================================================== Criminal Revision No. 301 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) =========================================================== Nikki Kumar @ Nikki Kumar Sharma @ Nicki Kumar, Son of Kailash Sharma resident of Mohalla- Rajendra Nagar, P.S Nagar Thana, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
(In CR. REV. No. 250 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Nath Tiwary, Adv. For the State : Smt. Anuradha Singh, A.P.P. (In CR. REV. No. 301 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Gopesh Kumar, A.P.P. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 07-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State. The Petitioners seek revision of the Judgment in Appeal dated 28.2.2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Criminal Appeal No. 02 of 2015 by which
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.250 of 2015 dt.07-05-2015 2/2 their conviction under Section 414 Indian Penal Code and Provisions of the Arms Act have been maintained with maximum punishment of two years and a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default of which 15 days rigorous imprisonment.
It has been submitted that the Petitioners have remained in custody for about 15 months as stated in paragraph-20 and XI of the petitions.
However, having gone through the impugned Judgment, I do not find any merit in the revision, the same is dismissed with modification in sentence to the period already undergone by them. (Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T