Akhilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51392 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2018 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar Son of Suresh Singh Resident of Mohalla - Kuraich Mahavir Asthan, Ward no.- 6, P.S.- Sasaram, District - Rohtas ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Prithivi Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 420/34 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the same offence, four FIRs have been lodged, out of which he has been granted bail by the Court below in two cases. Further, petitioner is daily wager and at the relevant time he was not in the service of the department, as such, he is not responsible for the shortage of rice, as alleged. Moreover, the officials of the Department has implicated the petitioner to save their skin. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, let the petitioner, mentioned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51392 of 2019(3) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sasaram Model Police Station Case No. 344 of 2018, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tempers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T