Veerjeet Kumar @ Bijendra Kumar @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4464 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2020 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== VEERJEET KUMAR @ BIJENDRA KUMAR @ CHHOTU Son of Yogendra Prasad Resident of village - Kera, P.S.- Daudnagar, Dist.- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Baxi SRP Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 05-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case no. 218 of 2020 registered against unknown under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, it is stated by the informant that while the work of the bank was on, about eight unknown persons forcibly entered the bank, beat up the guard and robbed the bank of Rs. 64 lacs on the point of country made pistol and knife. It is further stated that the informant can identify the accused on seeing them again.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR was registered against unknown. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case during course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of the petitioner extracted by the police in one another case. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4464 of 2021(3) dt.05-07-2021 2/2 incriminating article has been recovered from his possession and he has not been put on TI Parade inspite of being in custody since 14.8.2020. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case. The application for bail is opposed by learned counsel for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case together with the petitioner not having been put on TI Parade, his being in custody since 14.8.2020 and charge sheet having been submitted in the case, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case no. 218 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U