Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15281 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -302 Year- 2014 Thana -WAJIRGANJ DistrictGAYA ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Son of Niranjan Singh, Resident of Village- Dakshingaon, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 03-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452 /34 /323 /324 /307/504 of IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is to have shot fire which caused injury to the informant.
It is submitted that the petitioner has also been assaulted and he also sustained injuries and remained in hospital. He has been in custody since 11.7.2014 having no criminal antecedent.
Learned counsel for the informant submits that the injury has been caused on the vital part of the informant and after
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15281 of 2015 (2) dt.03-06-2015 2/2 investigation the case has been found true and charge-sheet has been submitted.
Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya/court concerned in Wazirganj P. S. Case No. 302 of 2014 after framing of charge with following conditions:-
1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.
2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T