Neta Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3618 of 2018 ====================================================== Neta Kumar Singh, son of late Ramesh Singh, resident of village-Paterwa, P.S. Motihari Muffasil, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1, The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise, Prohibition & Registration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Superintendent of Excise, East Champaran, Motihari.

3. The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari.

4. The Officer-Incharge, Ghorasahan Police Station, East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar -SC11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 05-03-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (a Passion Pro Motorcycle) bearing Registration No. BR05E 4996, which has been seized in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No.597/2017 due to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending

Patna High Court CWJC No.3618 of 2018(2) dt.05-03-2018 2/2 finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing two sureties to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Motihari within a period of one week from the date of his furnishing the sureties and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- U