Yogendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And O

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.107 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Yogendra Mahto S/o- Late Chamari Mahto R/o Village- Amava, P.O.- Haranatand, P.S.- Naurangiya, District- West Champaran. At present Chairman, PACS Mahuawa Kataharwa- Block Bagaha- 2, DistrictWest Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. Registrar Cooperative Society, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah

4. District Cooperative Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah

5. Block Cooperative Extension Officer, Block Bagaha-2, West Champaran, Bettiah

6. Centre-in-Charge, SFC Paddy Purchase Centre, Bagaha, West Champaran

7. Manager, PACS Mahuawa Kataharwa- Block Bagaha-2, District- West Champaran

8. The Managing Director, National Central Cooperative Bank, West Champaran, Bettiah

9. The Branch Manager, National Cooperative Society, Bagaha Branch, West Champaran, Bettiha .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the State-Respondent/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Sharma, AC to SC-22 For the Cooperative Bank : Mr. P.K. Verma, Sr. Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 11-02-2016 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Sharma, learned Assistant Counsel to Standing Counsel No.22, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Heard also Mr. P.K. Verma, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Cooperative Bank.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.107 of 2016 (3) dt.11-02-2016 2/2 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) K.C.jha/- U