Baidyanath Prasad @ Vidyanath Prasad @ Bidyanath @ Baidyanath Pd. Chaurasiya v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1688 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -283 Year- 2015 Thana -MOTIHARI MUFASIL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Baidyanath Prasad @ Vidyanath Prasad @ Bidyanath @ Baidyanath Pd. Chaurasiya Son of Krishna Bhagat Resident of Village-Basmanpur, P.S.Mufassil, Motihari, Dist East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Pushpa Devi W/o Baidyanath Prasad@Vidyanath Prasad@Bidyanath @Baidya nath Pd. Chaurasiya of Village- Nautan khap, P.s Nautan, District West Champaran .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Meena Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner happens to be husband of the informant and it appears that the informant went to the house of the petitioner on the assurance of the court but she was again, brutally, assaulted by the petitioner and his other family members.

Learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner submits that the informant has sustained simple injury and as a matter of fact, no such occurrence, as alleged in the first informant report, did ever take place and the petitioner is still ready to keep the informant with him with full honour and dignity.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1688 of 2016 (2) dt.21-01-2016 2/2 Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 283 of 2015 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari stands rejected.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and try to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably, within three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, failing which, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the learned trial court itself. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) A.K.V./- U T