Ayodhya Singh @ Ram Ayodhya Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3902 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2013 Thana -CHARPOKHARI District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Ayodhya Singh @ Ram Ayodhya Singh Son of Late Ram Dayal Singh, Resident of Village - Englishpur (Semraon), P.S. - Charpokhari, District - Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anuradha Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 37 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, Renu Pratap Singh, the son of the petitioner and two un-known being armed with Katta caught Jitendra Singh, the brother of the informant and shot him resulting in the way to hospital, the brother of the informant died. During investigation the name of the petitioner transpired that he was also involved in the crime.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is an old man aged about 75 years, the witnesses who

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3902 of 2016 (2) dt.12-02-2016 2/2 are close relatives of the informant, have taken the name of the petitioner only with a view to implicate him also along with his son, in the fardbeyan there is specific allegation against Renu Pratap Singh, the son of the petitioner and two un-known and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and, as such, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional District Judge, Vth, Bhojpur at Ara arising out of Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 37 of 2013 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T