Subhash Yadav @ Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58140 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2019 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== SUBHASH YADAV @ SANTOSH KUMAR @ SANTOSH YADAV Son of Laldhari Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Inday, P.S.- Sheikhpura, DistrictSheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Syed. Rizwanul Haque For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s) as pointed out by the office, it any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 281 of 2019, registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 (Amendment Act), 2018.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against this petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58140 of 2021(2) dt.17-12-2021 2/2 P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.) Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T